šŸŒ Iran launches first-ever direct attack on Israel

Plus: Declining help

IN TODAYā€™S EDITION
1ļøāƒ£ Israel vows answer to Iranā€™s historic attack
2ļøāƒ£ Is the world getting tighter?
3ļøāƒ£ How to get fired at a German art gallery

Hi Intriguer. One way to describe Iranā€™s historic attack on Israel yesterday (our lead story) is to say it was ā€œperformativeā€. I.e, it was calibrated to send a message rather than cause damage.

That may be right, though hereā€™s a question: did Iranā€™s 350 missiles and drones do such little damage because Iran gave everyone a heads-up? Or was it because Israeli and allied air defences were superior? Or was it because half of Iranā€™s ballistic missiles ended up failing? The answer, of course, is all three.

But enough from me. Letā€™s dive in, shall we?

PS - Do you live around DC? Join us for a chat with spy-turned-author Jack Beaumont on Wednesday April 24th!

THE HEADLINES

Scholz in China.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz travelled to China over the weekend, accompanied by a delegation of executives from Mercedes, BMW and other firms. The German leader reiterated concerns about Chinaā€™s unfair competition, which were reportedly dismissed as ā€œfake questionsā€ by the Chinese side. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen delivered a similar message to China a week ago.

The ā€˜forgottenā€™ war.
Today (Monday) marks a year since fighting broke out between two rival factions in Sudan, displacing some 8.5 million people. A distracted international community has met just 5% of the UNā€™s latest humanitarian appeal, so France is today hosting a conference to raise awareness (and funds).

Samsung regains top phone maker crown.
Apple iPhone shipments dropped by around 10% over the first quarter of the year, allowing Samsung to regain the top spot. The South Korean giant now accounts for almost 21% of the global market, while Apple - facing increased competition - now holds 17%.

Singapore PM to step down.
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will step down next month, handing the reins to his deputy Lawrence Wong after two decades in power. The move comes ahead of general elections next year.

Trump ā€˜hush moneyā€™ trial kicks off.
Former US President Donald Trump will appear in a New York courthouse today, accused of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in relation to a hush payment made to Stormy Daniels. Heā€™s the first former US president to stand trial in a criminal case, which is expected to run for six to eight weeks.

TOP STORY

Iran launches first-ever direct attack on Israel

The trajectory of Iranā€™s weekend attacks. Credits: WSJ.

After three decades of shadow war and 13 days of foreshadowing, Iran launched its first-ever direct attack on Israel early on Sunday morning.

The attack - which comes after Israelā€™s recent airstrike on the Iranian embassy compound in Damascus - was unprecedented for its scale (350 projectiles), target (Israel directly), and source (Iran directly).

Iran also used different weapons (drones / cruise missiles / ballistic missiles); with different speeds (nine hours / two hours / 12 minutes to target); from different sites (mostly Iran, but also proxies in Yemen, Iraq and Syria).

The presumed aim was for them all to reach Israel en masse to overwhelm Israel's air defences. But most projectiles were still downed before even reaching Israelā€™s borders, thanks to:

  • Support from allies like the US, UK, and France

  • Iran's own technical failings (half its ~110 ballistic missiles failed), and

  • Intervention from neighbours like Jordan (a statement to placate domestic anti-Israel sentiment said Jordan only shot down drones in its airspace as "self-defenceā€ rather than for the benefit of Israel).

Israel's layered air defences then handled most of the rest, with the ~16 minutes of action reportedly costing Israel an estimated $1B.

Seven of Iran's 110 ballistic missiles still made it through, causing minor damage at Nevatim airbase, the main home for Israel's F35 fighter jets (which Iran blames for Israelā€™s earlier Damascus attack).

And throughout it all, Iran's behaviour was interesting to watch.

72 hours before launch, it started 'telegraphing' its plans and then, with drones in the air, its UN mission tweeted that "the matter can be deemed concluded" (ie, ā€˜no backsiesā€™). After impact, Iran's president and others went on to warn Israel to just leave it, or face more attacks.

Why? Iran was likely looking for that elusive sweet spot in its shifting Venn diagram of a) satisfying its own domestic pressure to respond to Israel, b) maintaining credibility in the broader region, and yet probably also c) assuming few projectiles would actually hit Israel, narrowing Israel's justification to hit back.

And the world's responses have been intriguing, mostly mixing condemnation of Iran with an urging of Israel not to escalate things further. US officials are also describing the events as a major victory for Israel, likely seeking to give Netanyahu political space to just "take the win".

But Israel's leaders are seeing it differently, with key hardliners in Netanyahu's threadbare coalition saying Israel should respond with a "crushing attack" that resonates ā€œfor generationsā€. So Netanyahu is again facing pressure abroad to show restraint, while facing pressure at home to go hard.

And that presents Netanyahu with his own shifting Venn diagram, seeking to a) respond to domestic pressures, b) maintain regional credibility, and c) retain international solidarity, without just d) bolstering the regime's support in Iran.

INTRIGUEā€™S TAKE

So this whole situation now looks like one giant Rubikā€™s cube of leverage, escalation, deterrence, and destabilisation. But have a think about who 'wins':

  • Israel has now flexed two of its sources of power (air defence and alliances), and seen two of its vulnerabilities moved off the front pages (political instability and the humanitarian toll in Gaza), watching them both be replaced with a vivid global illustration of the very thing Israel has been warning about for decades: Iranian missiles over Israel.

  • Meanwhile, Iran claims it's now shown its resolve, flexed its ability to penetrate Israel's air defences, and perfectly calibrated it all (ā€˜maximum symbolism, minimum damageā€™) to avoid escalation.

But ultimately, rather than deter Israel, Iran essentially gave it a much-needed moment of international solidarity. Thatā€™s an Israeli win. And yet Israel's leaders - fuelled by the historic sight of Iranian missiles over Jerusalem - will struggle to pocket that solidarity and heed the worldā€™s calls for restraint.

That turns up the heat for the region, where everyone keeps saying they don't want a wider war, and yet everyone keeps crisscrossing the map with red lines: each intended to end the cycle, but all collectively raising the risk of accelerating it.

Also worth noting:

  • Shortly before launching its attack, Iran also seized a Portuguese-flagged cargo ship carrier in the Strait of Hormuz, claiming it was Israeli-owned. 20 sailors from the Philippines were on board.

  • Shrapnel from Iranā€™s attack on Israel critically injured a 10-year-old Arab-Israeli Bedouin girl in the Negev desert.

  • Hours after Iranā€™s attack, Hamas reportedly rejected the latest ceasefire proposal from mediators.

  • Following the weekendā€™s attacks, the US House Speaker now says heā€™ll ā€œtry againā€ to bring a stalled US military aid package to a vote, including support for Israel plus potentially Ukraine and US allies in Asia.

A MESSAGE FROM GROUND NEWS

Be informed, not instructed

See every side of the story with Ground News, a website and app that gathers articles from sources worldwide so readers can get diverse perspectives, compare coverage and stay fully informed.

For every breaking news story, instantly access every article published on it with context on each sourceā€™s political leaning, parent company funding it and how reliable their reporting is.

MEANWHILE, ELSEWHEREā€¦

  1. šŸ‡ØšŸ‡³Ā China: The third-highest ranking member of Chinaā€™s Communist Party has travelled to North Korea to meet the hermit stateā€™s leader, Kim Jong-un. Chinaā€™s official read-out offers little detail, though quotes Zhao Leji as saying the two neighbours have long been ā€œgood neighbours and struggled togetherā€.

  2. šŸ‡©šŸ‡ŖĀ Germany: Chancellor Olaf Scholz has announced heā€™s sending a Patriot air defence system and additional missiles to Ukraine, but is still holding out on sharing Germanyā€™s highly-coveted Taurus missiles. The decision follows a call on Saturday between the Chancellor and Ukrainian President Zelensky focusing on recent Russian airstrikes.

  3. šŸ‡®šŸ‡©Ā Indonesia: Jakarta has denied using air strikes in West Papua against a secessionist armed group, after a New Zealand pilot being held captive by the group appeared in a video accusing the Indonesian military of making his situation unsafe. The Kiwi pilot was taken hostage by the West Papua National Liberation Army early last year.

  4. šŸ‡ØšŸ‡±Ā Chile: Chilean authorities have announced plans to seek the extradition of two Venezuelans suspected of playing a part in the murder of a political dissident. Ronald Ojeda, a former military lieutenant and Venezuelan dissident, was murdered in Chile in February.

  5. šŸ‡³šŸ‡ŖĀ Niger: Russian military instructors have arrived in Niger as part of a security agreement between Moscow and Nigerā€™s military junta. Since the army overthrew President Mohamed Bazoum last year, the country has cut military and diplomatic ties with France and has withdrawn from a military agreement with the US.

EXTRA INTRIGUE

Your weekly roundup of the worldā€™s lighter newsĀ 

CHART OF THE DAY

Credits: Statista.

In 1970, the UN endorsed a call for wealthier countries to give 0.7% of their national income in aid, with a view to hitting that target by 1980. As of 2023, only five members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), considered a club of wealthier nations, reached the target.

Last Thursdayā€™s poll: Do you see a real risk of war spreading in our world?

šŸŸ©šŸŸ©šŸŸ©šŸŸ©šŸŸ©šŸŸ©Ā šŸ”„ Yep - the ingredients are there (64%)

šŸŸØšŸŸØšŸŸØā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļø ā›°ļø It'll be a bumpy few years, but the world won't make this mistake again (32%)

ā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļø āœŒļø Chill - it's just a beat-up by folks selling guns and newspapers (4%)

ā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļøā¬œļø āœļø Other (write in!) (1%)

Your two cents:

  • šŸ”„Ā E: ā€œLarge-scale peace has historically been the exception not the norm.ā€

  • šŸ”„Ā B.J: ā€œThe elements are there. World leaders tend to include some individuals with big egos that make them focused on their own survival at any cost, insensitive to obvious dynamics, and surrounded by people who are forced to agree with them (or pay the consequences). Sometimes, it takes just a few key people like that to do something ill-advised that escalates a situation to the point where countries have to respond.ā€

  • ā›°ļø C.O.N: ā€œWe all lose the next one and no economy would be left unscathed.ā€

  • āœļøĀ N.J: ā€œIf you look beyond the headlines there already is war all over the planet. Fortunately each has stayed "local" mostly. But Sudan, South Sudan, much of western Africa, Myanmar, China- India, Korea-Korea are all ongoing conflicts.ā€

āœļø Corrections Corner
Thanks to the Intriguers who pointed out (from Fridayā€™s edition) that Saudi Arabiaā€™s megaproject is called Neom (not Neon).

Was this forwarded to you? We're a team of ex-diplomats producing a concise and engaging geopolitical briefing for 85k+ leaders each day. Itā€™s free to subscribe.

Join the conversation

or to participate.